https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102397 The Department appealed against the Commissioner (Appeals) order that directed verification and extension of credit due to procedural lapses. The Assistant Commissioner found insufficient evidence to support the claim that processed goods were received at a specific unit, leading the Department to deny credit entitlement. The Tribunal ruled that the Department's failure to issue a show cause notice and compliance with the Commissioner's order precluded them from appealing. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating it lacked merit as proper procedures were not followed in challenging the credit entitlement decision. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:30:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102397 The Department appealed against the Commissioner (Appeals) order that directed verification and extension of credit due to procedural lapses. The Assistant Commissioner found insufficient evidence to support the claim that processed goods were received at a specific unit, leading the Department to deny credit entitlement. The Tribunal ruled that the Department's failure to issue a show cause notice and compliance with the Commissioner's order precluded them from appealing. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating it lacked merit as proper procedures were not followed in challenging the credit entitlement decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102397