https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102377 The High Court overturned the Sessions Judge's decision to discharge the accused in a case involving the wrongful retention of company property under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court reinstated proceedings before the trial court, emphasizing the need for a swift resolution. The accused's arguments of promissory estoppel and procedural impropriety were dismissed, affirming the company's right to recover its property. The trial was directed to proceed expeditiously in line with established guidelines. en-us Tue, 06 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:51:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102377 The High Court overturned the Sessions Judge's decision to discharge the accused in a case involving the wrongful retention of company property under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court reinstated proceedings before the trial court, emphasizing the need for a swift resolution. The accused's arguments of promissory estoppel and procedural impropriety were dismissed, affirming the company's right to recover its property. The trial was directed to proceed expeditiously in line with established guidelines. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 06 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102377