<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 844 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102372</link>
    <description>A stay order is interim in nature and does not finally determine the dispute, so an application to modify it cannot be rejected merely because the authority lacks power of review; the request must be examined on its merits. The appellate authority also had to allow reasonable time to make the required deposit after disposing of the modification application before dismissing the appeal. Refusal to consider the modification request on the stated ground was incorrect, and dismissal of the appeal without reasonable time for compliance could not be sustained. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the modification application in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 844 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102372</link>
      <description>A stay order is interim in nature and does not finally determine the dispute, so an application to modify it cannot be rejected merely because the authority lacks power of review; the request must be examined on its merits. The appellate authority also had to allow reasonable time to make the required deposit after disposing of the modification application before dismissing the appeal. Refusal to consider the modification request on the stated ground was incorrect, and dismissal of the appeal without reasonable time for compliance could not be sustained. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the modification application in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>