<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 296 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102370</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, affirming that the tax rate under item 9(b) of Schedule III of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act did not violate Article 304(a) of the Constitution. The appeal was dismissed, with the Court ruling that the imposition of tax on inter-State sales of tanned hides, previously taxed at the untanned stage, was consistent with the Central Sales Tax Act and not unconstitutional discrimination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 296 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102370</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, affirming that the tax rate under item 9(b) of Schedule III of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act did not violate Article 304(a) of the Constitution. The appeal was dismissed, with the Court ruling that the imposition of tax on inter-State sales of tanned hides, previously taxed at the untanned stage, was consistent with the Central Sales Tax Act and not unconstitutional discrimination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>