<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 907 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102367</link>
    <description>Personal penalty could not be sustained where it rested solely on a driver&#039;s statement that was accepted only in part and was unsupported by any independent corroboration. The same statement had been found unreliable on the question of truck ownership, making the reliance on it against the appellant internally inconsistent. In the absence of evidence linking the appellant to the concealment or transportation of the seized goods, the penalty was not justified and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:35:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 907 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102367</link>
      <description>Personal penalty could not be sustained where it rested solely on a driver&#039;s statement that was accepted only in part and was unsupported by any independent corroboration. The same statement had been found unreliable on the question of truck ownership, making the reliance on it against the appellant internally inconsistent. In the absence of evidence linking the appellant to the concealment or transportation of the seized goods, the penalty was not justified and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>