<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102363</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, the judgment of the company court was set aside, and the application, C.P. No. 27 of 1988, was dismissed. The court determined that the petition did not meet the criteria for action under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, the company court exceeded the pleadings, and the petition was filed with an ulterior motive of recovering money. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102363</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, the judgment of the company court was set aside, and the application, C.P. No. 27 of 1988, was dismissed. The court determined that the petition did not meet the criteria for action under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, the company court exceeded the pleadings, and the petition was filed with an ulterior motive of recovering money. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>