https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102357 The court held that despite the change in ownership of the premises to the employee's wife, the employee must still restore possession to the company as the tenant under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956. The offense under section 630 was deemed a continuing offense, with the employee liable for fines for each month of wrongful possession until restoration. The court ordered the employee to vacate the premises by a specified date, imposed fines dating back to 1977 until restoration, and warned of imprisonment for non-compliance. The appeal was allowed, the employee was convicted, fined, and directed to restore possession to the company. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:03:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102357 The court held that despite the change in ownership of the premises to the employee's wife, the employee must still restore possession to the company as the tenant under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956. The offense under section 630 was deemed a continuing offense, with the employee liable for fines for each month of wrongful possession until restoration. The court ordered the employee to vacate the premises by a specified date, imposed fines dating back to 1977 until restoration, and warned of imprisonment for non-compliance. The appeal was allowed, the employee was convicted, fined, and directed to restore possession to the company. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102357