https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102353 The appeals were dismissed as the opponent had adequate opportunities to defend the case, the complainant was considered a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, and the opponent was held liable for damages for not fulfilling services. An appeal filed against the wrong person was also rejected. The appellant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 in costs to the respondent. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102353 The appeals were dismissed as the opponent had adequate opportunities to defend the case, the complainant was considered a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, and the opponent was held liable for damages for not fulfilling services. An appeal filed against the wrong person was also rejected. The appellant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 in costs to the respondent. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 22 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102353