<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 263 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102351</link>
    <description>Exporters who act bona fide with normal banking precautions and due diligence are not in contravention of section 18(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 where non-realisation of export proceeds results from third-party conduct or circumstances beyond their control. The cargo was released by the carrier without the required documents and without the exporters&#039; consent, and they promptly pursued recovery through correspondence and a civil suit. On those facts, the statutory requirement of delayed repatriation caused by the exporter&#039;s own act, omission, or refraining from action was not satisfied, so no contravention was established and the penalty could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 263 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102351</link>
      <description>Exporters who act bona fide with normal banking precautions and due diligence are not in contravention of section 18(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 where non-realisation of export proceeds results from third-party conduct or circumstances beyond their control. The cargo was released by the carrier without the required documents and without the exporters&#039; consent, and they promptly pursued recovery through correspondence and a civil suit. On those facts, the statutory requirement of delayed repatriation caused by the exporter&#039;s own act, omission, or refraining from action was not satisfied, so no contravention was established and the penalty could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>