<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 483 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102350</link>
    <description>Classification of goods cleared in disassembled condition depended on whether blueprints, diagrams, technical specifications or similar material established that they were identifiable as constituent parts of a complete machine under Heading 8454.00. In the absence of sufficient technical evidence showing that the instalment-wise clearances could be treated as complete machinery parts rather than mere parts, the lower authority&#039;s classification was considered reasonable. The appellant was nevertheless allowed to produce further material before the Commissioner, and the impugned order was set aside with the matter remitted for reconsideration on a fuller evidentiary record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:50:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 483 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102350</link>
      <description>Classification of goods cleared in disassembled condition depended on whether blueprints, diagrams, technical specifications or similar material established that they were identifiable as constituent parts of a complete machine under Heading 8454.00. In the absence of sufficient technical evidence showing that the instalment-wise clearances could be treated as complete machinery parts rather than mere parts, the lower authority&#039;s classification was considered reasonable. The appellant was nevertheless allowed to produce further material before the Commissioner, and the impugned order was set aside with the matter remitted for reconsideration on a fuller evidentiary record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>