<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 287 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102341</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition in part, ruling in favor of the petitioner by reinstating them as a whole-time director, affirming the principles of partnership, and ordering the transfer of shares to maintain parity between the parties. The court declared the extraordinary general meeting invalid, preventing the ousting of the petitioner, and directed the amendment of the company&#039;s articles of association to reflect equal participation. Winding up the company was deemed unnecessary, with the court providing detailed directions to address grievances and ensure smooth operation without issuing a permanent injunction. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:21:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 287 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102341</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition in part, ruling in favor of the petitioner by reinstating them as a whole-time director, affirming the principles of partnership, and ordering the transfer of shares to maintain parity between the parties. The court declared the extraordinary general meeting invalid, preventing the ousting of the petitioner, and directed the amendment of the company&#039;s articles of association to reflect equal participation. Winding up the company was deemed unnecessary, with the court providing detailed directions to address grievances and ensure smooth operation without issuing a permanent injunction. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>