<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (12) TMI 248 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102323</link>
    <description>A contractual arbitration clause does not oust the company court&#039;s special statutory jurisdiction in winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act, because such petitions affect creditors, contributories and shareholders as a class. The clause may still bind the parties inter se, but it cannot by itself prevent the company court from deciding whether a winding-up order should be made. An objection based on arbitration may be raised, yet a stay of winding-up proceedings is not automatic and depends on whether the dispute is bona fide, whether a prima facie defence calls for arbitration, and whether the circumstances justify discretionary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (12) TMI 248 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102323</link>
      <description>A contractual arbitration clause does not oust the company court&#039;s special statutory jurisdiction in winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act, because such petitions affect creditors, contributories and shareholders as a class. The clause may still bind the parties inter se, but it cannot by itself prevent the company court from deciding whether a winding-up order should be made. An objection based on arbitration may be raised, yet a stay of winding-up proceedings is not automatic and depends on whether the dispute is bona fide, whether a prima facie defence calls for arbitration, and whether the circumstances justify discretionary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>