https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102312 A mere reference to technical collaboration on product labels did not, on the material before the Tribunal, prove use of another's registered brand name or justify denial of exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. at the pre-deposit stage. The labels primarily showed the applicant's own name and model details, and the cited precedent was treated as applicable. The duty demand and penalty were therefore held prima facie to be covered by the exemption, and waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted. en-us Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:28:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102312 A mere reference to technical collaboration on product labels did not, on the material before the Tribunal, prove use of another's registered brand name or justify denial of exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. at the pre-deposit stage. The labels primarily showed the applicant's own name and model details, and the cited precedent was treated as applicable. The duty demand and penalty were therefore held prima facie to be covered by the exemption, and waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102312