https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102303 The Supreme Court modified the installment schedule to ensure the balance consideration is paid by the end of 1996 in equal bi-monthly installments, upheld the requirement for a revolving bank guarantee, and maintained the default and forfeiture conditions. The appeal by the financial institutions was allowed in part, and the appeal by Buxa was dismissed. en-us Tue, 16 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102303 The Supreme Court modified the installment schedule to ensure the balance consideration is paid by the end of 1996 in equal bi-monthly installments, upheld the requirement for a revolving bank guarantee, and maintained the default and forfeiture conditions. The appeal by the financial institutions was allowed in part, and the appeal by Buxa was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 16 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102303