<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 271 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102289</link>
    <description>The court granted sanction under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the amalgamation of five companies, with one company as the petitioner, despite objections raised by the Regional Director of Company Affairs regarding the commercial nature of the trading companies involved. The court referenced a previous judgment overruling similar objections and emphasized the need to ensure the reasonableness of the scheme and compliance with the memorandum of association. The court sanctioned the scheme, directing the transferee company to adhere strictly to its memorandum of association, and awarded costs to the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 271 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102289</link>
      <description>The court granted sanction under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the amalgamation of five companies, with one company as the petitioner, despite objections raised by the Regional Director of Company Affairs regarding the commercial nature of the trading companies involved. The court referenced a previous judgment overruling similar objections and emphasized the need to ensure the reasonableness of the scheme and compliance with the memorandum of association. The court sanctioned the scheme, directing the transferee company to adhere strictly to its memorandum of association, and awarded costs to the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>