<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 702 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102278</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the classification of picture varnish, paper coating, and paper glazer under Chapter CET sub-heading 3208.90. The appellant succeeded in the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction in issuing the show cause notice, despite the classification dispute being settled against them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:03:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 702 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102278</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the classification of picture varnish, paper coating, and paper glazer under Chapter CET sub-heading 3208.90. The appellant succeeded in the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction in issuing the show cause notice, despite the classification dispute being settled against them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>