https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102277 Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was refused where the appellant did not deposit the amount within the time granted. The Tribunal rejected the explanation of financial difficulty because that plea had already been found unsubstantiated when stay was allowed. It also held that later deposit of the amount, without seeking timely modification of the stay conditions, could not cure the default or justify restoration. The appeal therefore remained dismissed. en-us Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:02:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102277 Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was refused where the appellant did not deposit the amount within the time granted. The Tribunal rejected the explanation of financial difficulty because that plea had already been found unsubstantiated when stay was allowed. It also held that later deposit of the amount, without seeking timely modification of the stay conditions, could not cure the default or justify restoration. The appeal therefore remained dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102277