<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 155 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102270</link>
    <description>A single shareholder cannot compel circulation or AGM inclusion of a resolution for appointing an auditor other than the retiring auditor unless the requisition requirements under section 188 of the Companies Act, 1956 are met. Special notice under section 190 and the power under section 225 do not operate independently of section 188; the statutory scheme requires the prescribed number of members, timely deposit of the resolution, and payment of sufficient expenses before the company is bound to act. Provisions on auditor and director appointments or removals must be read together, and no express or implied exception dispenses with the requisition requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:54:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 155 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102270</link>
      <description>A single shareholder cannot compel circulation or AGM inclusion of a resolution for appointing an auditor other than the retiring auditor unless the requisition requirements under section 188 of the Companies Act, 1956 are met. Special notice under section 190 and the power under section 225 do not operate independently of section 188; the statutory scheme requires the prescribed number of members, timely deposit of the resolution, and payment of sufficient expenses before the company is bound to act. Provisions on auditor and director appointments or removals must be read together, and no express or implied exception dispenses with the requisition requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>