<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 781 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102268</link>
    <description>Insulating material used in a humidification plant was held to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. because it formed an integral part of the plant&#039;s temperature and humidity control function. The material was treated as covered by the notification&#039;s reference to materials and spares, and its use for maintenance did not exclude it from exemption. On that reasoning, duty-free benefit was available and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:52:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 781 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102268</link>
      <description>Insulating material used in a humidification plant was held to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. because it formed an integral part of the plant&#039;s temperature and humidity control function. The material was treated as covered by the notification&#039;s reference to materials and spares, and its use for maintenance did not exclude it from exemption. On that reasoning, duty-free benefit was available and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>