<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 780 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102267</link>
    <description>Redemption fine imposed on confiscated imported machinery was considered in light of the appellant being a State Government department that had acted against the background of governmental directives and representations on customs duty exemption. The dispute was confined to the quantum of fine, and the Tribunal held that partial relief was justified on the facts. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 4 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh, and the appeal succeeded to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:48:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 780 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102267</link>
      <description>Redemption fine imposed on confiscated imported machinery was considered in light of the appellant being a State Government department that had acted against the background of governmental directives and representations on customs duty exemption. The dispute was confined to the quantum of fine, and the Tribunal held that partial relief was justified on the facts. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 4 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh, and the appeal succeeded to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>