<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 281 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102265</link>
    <description>A special appeal under the High Court Rules lies only from a judgment that finally decides the case, not from an interlocutory order in company winding up proceedings. An order that merely permits the parties to pursue a compromise before the trial court does not finally dispose of the company petition and is therefore not appealable by special appeal. The proper course is to proceed before the trial court on the compromise. The special appeal was held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:46:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 281 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102265</link>
      <description>A special appeal under the High Court Rules lies only from a judgment that finally decides the case, not from an interlocutory order in company winding up proceedings. An order that merely permits the parties to pursue a compromise before the trial court does not finally dispose of the company petition and is therefore not appealable by special appeal. The proper course is to proceed before the trial court on the compromise. The special appeal was held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>