<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 779 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102264</link>
    <description>Spray-dried Spirulina powder was treated as a natural product rather than a manufactured excisable product, because processing such as drying, grinding or spray-drying did not alter its essential character. The earlier tribunal view on Spirulina, affirmed by the Supreme Court, was followed for the same classification issue. On that basis, the duty demand failed, and the related penalty and interest were also unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 779 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102264</link>
      <description>Spray-dried Spirulina powder was treated as a natural product rather than a manufactured excisable product, because processing such as drying, grinding or spray-drying did not alter its essential character. The earlier tribunal view on Spirulina, affirmed by the Supreme Court, was followed for the same classification issue. On that basis, the duty demand failed, and the related penalty and interest were also unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>