<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 778 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102263</link>
    <description>A rectification request under the Central Excise Act failed because a subsequent validating amendment could not retroactively create a mistake apparent from the record in an order already passed. The Tribunal reasoned that, on the date of the final order, the validating assent had not yet become operative, so the original decision could not be treated as erroneous for having ignored a provision that was not then in force. No existing statutory provision was overlooked in the original order, and the application for rectification was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:46:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 778 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102263</link>
      <description>A rectification request under the Central Excise Act failed because a subsequent validating amendment could not retroactively create a mistake apparent from the record in an order already passed. The Tribunal reasoned that, on the date of the final order, the validating assent had not yet become operative, so the original decision could not be treated as erroneous for having ignored a provision that was not then in force. No existing statutory provision was overlooked in the original order, and the application for rectification was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>