<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 939 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102260</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the import of knocked down components of vertical machining centres under the &quot;list attested procedure,&quot; except for the control panel, which was subject to confiscation. The penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced to Rs. 50,000. The appeal was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 939 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102260</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the import of knocked down components of vertical machining centres under the &quot;list attested procedure,&quot; except for the control panel, which was subject to confiscation. The penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced to Rs. 50,000. The appeal was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>