https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102248 The court held that a constituted attorney can file a petition for winding up under section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956, as there is no prohibition in the law. However, in this case, Pravinkumar Gosalia did not have the authority under his power of attorney to institute winding up proceedings. Thus, the court rejected the petition and made the judge's summons absolute, directing each party to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:19:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102248 The court held that a constituted attorney can file a petition for winding up under section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956, as there is no prohibition in the law. However, in this case, Pravinkumar Gosalia did not have the authority under his power of attorney to institute winding up proceedings. Thus, the court rejected the petition and made the judge's summons absolute, directing each party to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 14 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102248