<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 252 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102242</link>
    <description>Split legumes remained within the expression specified agricultural produce because the statutory definition covered scheduled items as well as their processed form, so market fee was leviable on sales of dal. A Schedule amendment under section 4A did not require a fresh notification under sections 6 or 8 where it only clarified an inclusion already implicit in the original schedule and notification. The levy challenge on that ground therefore failed. The appeals were allowed, the High Court&#039;s view on market fee liability was set aside, and the matters were remitted for consideration of surviving issues not decided by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 252 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102242</link>
      <description>Split legumes remained within the expression specified agricultural produce because the statutory definition covered scheduled items as well as their processed form, so market fee was leviable on sales of dal. A Schedule amendment under section 4A did not require a fresh notification under sections 6 or 8 where it only clarified an inclusion already implicit in the original schedule and notification. The levy challenge on that ground therefore failed. The appeals were allowed, the High Court&#039;s view on market fee liability was set aside, and the matters were remitted for consideration of surviving issues not decided by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>