https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102229 In winding up proceedings, the Company Court was treated as having wide control under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to entertain the official liquidator's claim for eviction and consequential reliefs against an occupant of company property, with execution to follow through the company-court mechanism. The court also found that non-payment of rent despite notice justified treating the occupant as a defaulter and trespasser, so eviction, arrears of rent, and damages were granted, with damages fixed at double the rent until delivery of possession. en-us Wed, 30 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:37:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102229 In winding up proceedings, the Company Court was treated as having wide control under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to entertain the official liquidator's claim for eviction and consequential reliefs against an occupant of company property, with execution to follow through the company-court mechanism. The court also found that non-payment of rent despite notice justified treating the occupant as a defaulter and trespasser, so eviction, arrears of rent, and damages were granted, with damages fixed at double the rent until delivery of possession. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 30 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102229