<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 275 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102218</link>
    <description>Orders passed in winding up proceedings, including disposed of transferred suits, are appealable under the Companies Act&#039;s special appellate provision. In guarantee disputes, a bank&#039;s appropriation from one cash credit account does not, by itself, preserve liability against guarantors who did not consent to or guarantee later independent accounts; amounts already adjusted from the borrower&#039;s account were not recoverable from the original surety, while the unpaid instalment remained due. A surety is not discharged merely because later cash credit facilities are opened, absent a material variation of the original contract without consent. Interest was recoverable at the contractual bank rate where the agreement so provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:21:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 275 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102218</link>
      <description>Orders passed in winding up proceedings, including disposed of transferred suits, are appealable under the Companies Act&#039;s special appellate provision. In guarantee disputes, a bank&#039;s appropriation from one cash credit account does not, by itself, preserve liability against guarantors who did not consent to or guarantee later independent accounts; amounts already adjusted from the borrower&#039;s account were not recoverable from the original surety, while the unpaid instalment remained due. A surety is not discharged merely because later cash credit facilities are opened, absent a material variation of the original contract without consent. Interest was recoverable at the contractual bank rate where the agreement so provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>