<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 735 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 30 lakhs to Rs. 13 lakhs and the penalty from Rs. 15 lakhs to Rs. 10 lakhs, dismissing the appeal with these modifications. This adjustment aimed to strike a balance between the gravity of the offense and the proportionality of the fines imposed, considering comparisons with previous cases and the appellants&#039; arguments regarding valuation, confiscation, and license application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 735 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 30 lakhs to Rs. 13 lakhs and the penalty from Rs. 15 lakhs to Rs. 10 lakhs, dismissing the appeal with these modifications. This adjustment aimed to strike a balance between the gravity of the offense and the proportionality of the fines imposed, considering comparisons with previous cases and the appellants&#039; arguments regarding valuation, confiscation, and license application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>