<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 664 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector of Central Excise&#039;s classification under Heading 8536.90, emphasizing the binding nature of lawful adjudication orders and rejecting the appellants&#039; refund claim based on subsequent correspondence suggesting a different classification. The Tribunal found no fault in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the deposited amount could not be refunded to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:03:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 664 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector of Central Excise&#039;s classification under Heading 8536.90, emphasizing the binding nature of lawful adjudication orders and rejecting the appellants&#039; refund claim based on subsequent correspondence suggesting a different classification. The Tribunal found no fault in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the deposited amount could not be refunded to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>