<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 267 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102206</link>
    <description>The court held that the company&#039;s contribution to perquisites should be calculated based on salary plus commission, citing the Gestetner Duplicators Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT case. The rejection of the petitioner&#039;s representation by the respondents was deemed unjustified as it contravened established law. The court found the impugned order to be arbitrary and in violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order, and directed the respondents to consider the company&#039;s contribution in line with the court&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:47:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 267 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102206</link>
      <description>The court held that the company&#039;s contribution to perquisites should be calculated based on salary plus commission, citing the Gestetner Duplicators Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT case. The rejection of the petitioner&#039;s representation by the respondents was deemed unjustified as it contravened established law. The court found the impugned order to be arbitrary and in violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order, and directed the respondents to consider the company&#039;s contribution in line with the court&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>