<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 269 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, N</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102181</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission rejected 10 applications under Section 127B(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the applicants failed to demonstrate compliance with the necessary requirements. The applications were deemed ineligible for consideration due to the absence of a Bill of Entry for the seized goods and the lack of a related Show Cause Notice (SCN). Consequently, the applications were not allowed to proceed under Section 127C(1) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:38:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 269 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, N</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102181</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission rejected 10 applications under Section 127B(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the applicants failed to demonstrate compliance with the necessary requirements. The applications were deemed ineligible for consideration due to the absence of a Bill of Entry for the seized goods and the lack of a related Show Cause Notice (SCN). Consequently, the applications were not allowed to proceed under Section 127C(1) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>