https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102173 Minutes, scrutineers' report and statutory filings supported the annual general meeting election, attracting the Companies Act presumption that the meeting was duly called, held and conducted. The challenge that defeated candidates should be treated as elected merely because no votes were cast against them was rejected as unsustainable. A requisition under section 169 of the Companies Act, 1956, could not be used to dislodge directors already validly elected through the prescribed procedure. In the absence of contrary evidence rebutting the documentary record, the plaintiffs' election and right to act as directors stood on a strong prima facie footing, and civil court jurisdiction was not barred. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:24:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102173 Minutes, scrutineers' report and statutory filings supported the annual general meeting election, attracting the Companies Act presumption that the meeting was duly called, held and conducted. The challenge that defeated candidates should be treated as elected merely because no votes were cast against them was rejected as unsustainable. A requisition under section 169 of the Companies Act, 1956, could not be used to dislodge directors already validly elected through the prescribed procedure. In the absence of contrary evidence rebutting the documentary record, the plaintiffs' election and right to act as directors stood on a strong prima facie footing, and civil court jurisdiction was not barred. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102173