https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102169 The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the sub-tenancy agreement, the landlord's consent, and the protection under the Bombay Rent Control Act. It found the conditions imposed by the Division Bench unwarranted at the interlocutory stage and directed an interim arrangement pending the suit. The requirement of the premises by the official liquidator for storing records was deemed relevant, and the landlord's application for possession was dismissed. The appeal was disposed of with specific directions for an interim arrangement, preserving the rights and contentions of the parties pending the suit. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102169 The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the sub-tenancy agreement, the landlord's consent, and the protection under the Bombay Rent Control Act. It found the conditions imposed by the Division Bench unwarranted at the interlocutory stage and directed an interim arrangement pending the suit. The requirement of the premises by the official liquidator for storing records was deemed relevant, and the landlord's application for possession was dismissed. The appeal was disposed of with specific directions for an interim arrangement, preserving the rights and contentions of the parties pending the suit. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 25 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102169