<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 204 - HIGH COURTOF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102136</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent-company, citing that the debt was bona fide disputed, the statutory notice did not comply with section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, and winding up would not serve justice or public interest. The petitioner was advised to pursue resolution through civil litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 204 - HIGH COURTOF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102136</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent-company, citing that the debt was bona fide disputed, the statutory notice did not comply with section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, and winding up would not serve justice or public interest. The petitioner was advised to pursue resolution through civil litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>