https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102134 The article explains that a notice calling a general meeting for election of directors and a managing director will not be invalid where it substantially discloses the business to be transacted and no misleading suppression is shown. It further states that the individual-notice requirement on candidature under section 257(1A) operates with section 257(1) and does not apply to a private company, except where the statutory exception is attracted. It also notes that the company court's supervisory powers under section 392(1) can include directions to convene a meeting when necessary for implementation of a sanctioned revival scheme, and are not displaced by section 186. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:27:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102134 The article explains that a notice calling a general meeting for election of directors and a managing director will not be invalid where it substantially discloses the business to be transacted and no misleading suppression is shown. It further states that the individual-notice requirement on candidature under section 257(1A) operates with section 257(1) and does not apply to a private company, except where the statutory exception is attracted. It also notes that the company court's supervisory powers under section 392(1) can include directions to convene a meeting when necessary for implementation of a sanctioned revival scheme, and are not displaced by section 186. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102134