<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 255 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102128</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up Timble Pvt. Ltd. under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to prove entitlement to charge interest on the disputed amount. The company admitted a balance due of Rs. 73,952.66, which was less than the amount claimed by the petitioner. The court ordered the company to pay the admitted amount by a specified date, leading to the dismissal of the petition and the discharge of the rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:20:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 255 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102128</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up Timble Pvt. Ltd. under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to prove entitlement to charge interest on the disputed amount. The company admitted a balance due of Rs. 73,952.66, which was less than the amount claimed by the petitioner. The court ordered the company to pay the admitted amount by a specified date, leading to the dismissal of the petition and the discharge of the rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>