<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 246 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102126</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside an order sanctioning a scheme of amalgamation under section 391 of the Companies Act between two companies due to lack of consideration for workmen&#039;s interests. The court directed a meeting for workmen to express their preferences through a secret ballot, with an offer that if a majority declined employment with the acquiring company, the scheme would be terminated, and retrenchment benefits offered. The court appointed a chairman to oversee the meeting, with only concerned workmen and nominated assistants allowed to attend, and the companies bearing the meeting costs. Further proceedings were adjourned based on the workmen&#039;s preferences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 246 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102126</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside an order sanctioning a scheme of amalgamation under section 391 of the Companies Act between two companies due to lack of consideration for workmen&#039;s interests. The court directed a meeting for workmen to express their preferences through a secret ballot, with an offer that if a majority declined employment with the acquiring company, the scheme would be terminated, and retrenchment benefits offered. The court appointed a chairman to oversee the meeting, with only concerned workmen and nominated assistants allowed to attend, and the companies bearing the meeting costs. Further proceedings were adjourned based on the workmen&#039;s preferences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>