<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 360 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102125</link>
    <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal held that where duty had been paid on a fabricated sulphur melter with coils and the item was used in the factory for manufacture of final products, a prima facie case could be made for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On that limited assessment, the Tribunal found no sufficient basis for immediate recovery and waived pre-deposit of the duty and penalty, staying recovery until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:17:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 360 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102125</link>
      <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal held that where duty had been paid on a fabricated sulphur melter with coils and the item was used in the factory for manufacture of final products, a prima facie case could be made for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On that limited assessment, the Tribunal found no sufficient basis for immediate recovery and waived pre-deposit of the duty and penalty, staying recovery until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>