https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102118 A statutory recovery scheme authorising arrest and detention for public dues was treated as constitutionally valid because it operated only after default and included safeguards such as limits on detention and restrictions for women and minors, so it did not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(d) or 21. The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and its Rules were treated as a complete code for such recovery, so Section 51 CPC was not applied in terms. However, detention could not stand where the mandatory inquiry under Rule 251, requiring consideration whether detention would likely secure payment, had not been made; the existing warrants were therefore quashed. en-us Tue, 23 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102118 A statutory recovery scheme authorising arrest and detention for public dues was treated as constitutionally valid because it operated only after default and included safeguards such as limits on detention and restrictions for women and minors, so it did not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(d) or 21. The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and its Rules were treated as a complete code for such recovery, so Section 51 CPC was not applied in terms. However, detention could not stand where the mandatory inquiry under Rule 251, requiring consideration whether detention would likely secure payment, had not been made; the existing warrants were therefore quashed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 23 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102118