<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 347 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102113</link>
    <description>For goods notified under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, where more than one retail sale price is declared on the package, Explanation 2(a) deems the maximum declared price to be the retail sale price for valuation. As the packing carried two declared prices, assessment was required to proceed on the higher price, and that value was correctly adopted for excise assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 347 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102113</link>
      <description>For goods notified under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, where more than one retail sale price is declared on the package, Explanation 2(a) deems the maximum declared price to be the retail sale price for valuation. As the packing carried two declared prices, assessment was required to proceed on the higher price, and that value was correctly adopted for excise assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>