<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 211 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102110</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the winding-up petitions against the company for non-payment of debts. The petitioners failed to provide proof of serving statutory notices as required by the Companies Act, leading to the inability to invoke the deemed inability provision. Additionally, the petitioners did not sufficiently demonstrate the company&#039;s inability to pay debts, and the disputes raised by the company were considered genuine. The court emphasized the importance of complying with notice requirements and substantiating claims of a company&#039;s inability to pay debts. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:05:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 211 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102110</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the winding-up petitions against the company for non-payment of debts. The petitioners failed to provide proof of serving statutory notices as required by the Companies Act, leading to the inability to invoke the deemed inability provision. Additionally, the petitioners did not sufficiently demonstrate the company&#039;s inability to pay debts, and the disputes raised by the company were considered genuine. The court emphasized the importance of complying with notice requirements and substantiating claims of a company&#039;s inability to pay debts. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>