https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102096 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the company court's jurisdiction to entertain and dispose of suits involving the company under liquidation and additional defendants. The court held that Section 446(2) of the Companies Act allows the company court to handle such suits to facilitate the winding-up process and avoid unnecessary litigation. The appellant's contention that the suit should be filed in the High Court of Bombay was rejected, and no order as to costs was made. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:48:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102096 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the company court's jurisdiction to entertain and dispose of suits involving the company under liquidation and additional defendants. The court held that Section 446(2) of the Companies Act allows the company court to handle such suits to facilitate the winding-up process and avoid unnecessary litigation. The appellant's contention that the suit should be filed in the High Court of Bombay was rejected, and no order as to costs was made. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 11 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102096