<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 281 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102093</link>
    <description>A company&#039;s obligation to maintain and notify a registered office under the Companies Act was held not to permit directing the Registrar to collect a decree or to invoke inquiry or penal powers as a means of recovering judgment debt. Section 234&#039;s inquiry mechanism applies only to documents filed and to requests for further information and does not empower the Registrar to realise decree amounts; prosecution or fines for breach of registered-office rules remain the Registrar&#039;s enforcement discretion and not a recovery route for a decree-holder. The operative remedies for enforcement are execution at the correct registered address or initiation of winding up proceedings against the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:45:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 281 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102093</link>
      <description>A company&#039;s obligation to maintain and notify a registered office under the Companies Act was held not to permit directing the Registrar to collect a decree or to invoke inquiry or penal powers as a means of recovering judgment debt. Section 234&#039;s inquiry mechanism applies only to documents filed and to requests for further information and does not empower the Registrar to realise decree amounts; prosecution or fines for breach of registered-office rules remain the Registrar&#039;s enforcement discretion and not a recovery route for a decree-holder. The operative remedies for enforcement are execution at the correct registered address or initiation of winding up proceedings against the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>