<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 442 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102090</link>
    <description>Self-contained caterpillar wheel loaders used in dredging remained independent heavy machinery because they had their own power source, weighed about 15 tonnes each, and were capable of general earth-moving use. Their deployment in dredging did not make them ships, boats, floating structures, or parts of a vessel under Chapter 89; they were correctly classified under Customs Tariff Heading 84, including Heading 84.29. Because exemption under Notification No. 20/99-Cus. depended on Chapter 89 classification, the loaders did not qualify, and the customs classification and denial of exemption were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:36:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 442 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102090</link>
      <description>Self-contained caterpillar wheel loaders used in dredging remained independent heavy machinery because they had their own power source, weighed about 15 tonnes each, and were capable of general earth-moving use. Their deployment in dredging did not make them ships, boats, floating structures, or parts of a vessel under Chapter 89; they were correctly classified under Customs Tariff Heading 84, including Heading 84.29. Because exemption under Notification No. 20/99-Cus. depended on Chapter 89 classification, the loaders did not qualify, and the customs classification and denial of exemption were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>