<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 323 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102088</link>
    <description>The court found that the judgment delivered without framing issues and proceeding to trial was a material irregularity affecting the case&#039;s disposal on merits. The judgment was set aside, and the matter was remitted for framing of issues, trial, and adjudication based on evidence. The court emphasized the importance of framing issues before trial for a fair opportunity for both parties to present their case, addressing issues of limitation and procedural irregularities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:40:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 323 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102088</link>
      <description>The court found that the judgment delivered without framing issues and proceeding to trial was a material irregularity affecting the case&#039;s disposal on merits. The judgment was set aside, and the matter was remitted for framing of issues, trial, and adjudication based on evidence. The court emphasized the importance of framing issues before trial for a fair opportunity for both parties to present their case, addressing issues of limitation and procedural irregularities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>