<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 289 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102083</link>
    <description>A procedural amendment clarifying the constitution of a petitioner-firm in a winding-up petition may be permitted where it is bona fide, causes no prejudice, and introduces no fresh cause of action. A technical defect in verification or affidavit wording, by itself, does not justify rejection of the petition. Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act does not bar such a petition because a winding-up proceeding is a statutory remedy, not a suit for enforcement of a contractual right. The amendment was allowed on a liberal approach, and the winding-up petition was left to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:34:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 289 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102083</link>
      <description>A procedural amendment clarifying the constitution of a petitioner-firm in a winding-up petition may be permitted where it is bona fide, causes no prejudice, and introduces no fresh cause of action. A technical defect in verification or affidavit wording, by itself, does not justify rejection of the petition. Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act does not bar such a petition because a winding-up proceeding is a statutory remedy, not a suit for enforcement of a contractual right. The amendment was allowed on a liberal approach, and the winding-up petition was left to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>