<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 287 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102080</link>
    <description>A company under liquidation continues as a juristic person until dissolution, so its lands remain liable to urban land tax and may be assessed in a single unit while title is still vested in it. An inclusive definition of &quot;owner&quot; was treated as wide enough to cover such a company, including for assessment purposes. Pending proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 do not by themselves extinguish tax liability; liability continues until vesting in the Government actually occurs. The court also noted that valuation findings based on material before the taxing authorities will not be interfered with in writ jurisdiction absent perversity or arbitrariness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:29:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 287 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102080</link>
      <description>A company under liquidation continues as a juristic person until dissolution, so its lands remain liable to urban land tax and may be assessed in a single unit while title is still vested in it. An inclusive definition of &quot;owner&quot; was treated as wide enough to cover such a company, including for assessment purposes. Pending proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 do not by themselves extinguish tax liability; liability continues until vesting in the Government actually occurs. The court also noted that valuation findings based on material before the taxing authorities will not be interfered with in writ jurisdiction absent perversity or arbitrariness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>