<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 212 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102074</link>
    <description>Once the State assured withdrawal of the impugned instructions, no issue survived in the writ petition and the High Court should not have ruled on the taxability of the supply transactions under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. Findings on a question that had become infructuous could not stand, and the proper course was for the Assessing Authorities to decide the taxability independently and in accordance with law, without being influenced by the withdrawn instructions or by the High Court&#039;s earlier opinion. The merits observations were therefore vacated and the writ petition was treated as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 212 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102074</link>
      <description>Once the State assured withdrawal of the impugned instructions, no issue survived in the writ petition and the High Court should not have ruled on the taxability of the supply transactions under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. Findings on a question that had become infructuous could not stand, and the proper course was for the Assessing Authorities to decide the taxability independently and in accordance with law, without being influenced by the withdrawn instructions or by the High Court&#039;s earlier opinion. The merits observations were therefore vacated and the writ petition was treated as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>