https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102062 The court dismissed Company Applications Nos. 342, 343, and 344 of 1990, finding no prima facie case for oppression or mismanagement. The court allowed the MD to continue in his role and suggested that the board of directors could decide on adding more directors. The court refused the petitioners' application for a certificate to appeal to the Supreme Court, stating that no substantial question of law of general importance was involved. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:02:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102062 The court dismissed Company Applications Nos. 342, 343, and 344 of 1990, finding no prima facie case for oppression or mismanagement. The court allowed the MD to continue in his role and suggested that the board of directors could decide on adding more directors. The court refused the petitioners' application for a certificate to appeal to the Supreme Court, stating that no substantial question of law of general importance was involved. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 17 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102062